Sunday, June 12, 2011
Super 8 review
I've always enjoyed movies told from the point of view of children, The Sandlot (1993) was one of my favorite movies as a child and as I got older, I fell in love with Carol Reed's brilliant film The Fallen Idol (1948). There's something magical about the innocence of a child's eyes. Unfortunately, though, these types of movies have all but been abandoned lately, replaced by animated movies or depthless comedies and fantasy adventures. Super 8 is a return to movies starring kids where the kids aren't performing super-human feats like in the Spy Kids movies and Chronicles of Narnia or caricatures of kids as adults view them, instead they act like kids, doing kid things with a kids heart.
Much will be made about how director J.J. Abrams and producer Steven Spielberg are trying to harken back to movies like E.T. (1982), Close Encounters of the Third Kind (1977) both directed by Spielberg, and The Goonies (1985), written and produced by Spielberg, which is true. But to end it there is cop-out writing. The key to the direction of Super 8 can be found in the credits when the movie the kids have been making, "The Case" is shown. It's a zombie movie and the director, Charles (Ryan Griffiths), who has a Night of the Living Dead (1968) poster on his wall, throws in a reference to George Romero, the king of zombie movies, by having the zombie-creating chemical be produced "the Romero chemical company". This is a child's way of showing an influence (though some might say Quentin Tarentino also does it this way). Abrams also fills his movie with tributes to the films that influenced him, however he does it in a much subtler fashion. I'm not just talking about the Spielberg children/alien movies, either but a plethora of movies ranging from the B-movies to blockbusters.
Super 8 is set in the small town of Lillian, Ohio and revolves around a group of kids, who while making a movie on their Super 8 camera, become involved with an escaped monster and an attempted military cover-up. To give away much more of the plot would be a disservice to someone who hasn't seen the movie, but there's a lot about this movie that can be dissected without spoiling the plot. The "monster lose in a small town" and military aspects hearkens back to the big bug movies of the 50s such as Them! (1954) or Earth vs. the Spider (1958). Part of the joy of this kind of movie is how Abrams doesn't show you the monster until much later in the movie, instead we're only shown fleeting glances, a technique Abrams used in Cloverfield (2008), but one that reminded most of how in Alien (1979), Ridley Scott keeps the Xenomorph more of an idea, a shadow, or a dot on a scanner until the very end of the movie. M. Night Shyamalan's Signs (2002) is another movie that uses this tactic and was clearly an influence on Abrams. This heightens the suspense and induces true excitement, not just cheap thrills based of monsters jumping out of closets that have taken over horror since the slasher movement began. Even blockbusters like Jurassic Park (1993) makes an appearance, with the monster attack on a bus echoing the T-Rex's on the jeeps and the King Kong "sympathetic monster" angle is explored. So when I hear that Super 8 is just a repackaging of E.T. and The Goonies, I'm understandably incredulous of how much the reviewer formed their own opinion. Yes it's true that those movies are a big influence on Abrams, but he also brings a lot more to the table and offers a return to the time of moviemaking when movies were about a feeling and had a heart, not being beaten to death with special effects an d flat characters.
Is Super 8 a perfect movie? No, but any movie that brings back that true, warm feeling of childhood adventure is a welcome return to movie making these days.
4.5/5
Thursday, June 9, 2011
Song of the Day: June 9th
There's a lot of subtlety in the work of Mark Kozelek, whether it be the progression of chords in a slow building ballad or the boxer metaphors found in Ghosts of the Great Highway. However, no Kozelek song is written with more of subtle wink than "Wop-a-Din-Din" which, despite seemingly being a straight-forward love song, could easily go misunderstood by most of the people who listen to it. It starts out simply enough, with an opening stanza like "she's got big green eyes and a long Egyptian face/she moves across the floor at her own pace" it's seem to be pretty clearly a love song. Later, however, you may wonder at a line like "and if I role an kick around, I might knock her to the ground/but she'll come back anyhow" or "she'll yawn and stretch, and stare me down expressionless/and lay back down in her nest" but you may just chalk that up to some rough times and a little artistic expression. You'd be wrong, however, as this song, though never acknowledged anywhere in the lyrics (not even in the parts in Spanish), is about Kozelek's cat. That's what makes his work so interesting, he doesn't have to spell it out for his audience with a *wink-wink* at the end, he just lets the song speak for itself. This isn't lowest common denominator songwriting. If you get the joke, good for you, if not it's just a love song to human instead of a cat. And make no mistake, this is a love song.
Wednesday, June 8, 2011
X-Men: First Class review
Of the major superhero film franchises, X-Men hasn't had a universally acclaimed groundbreaker like The Dark Knight or a unmitigated stinker like Spider-Man 3 or either Fantastic Five movie. The X-Men movies have been continually solid, sometimes leaning towards excellent (X2) while other times dipping to just merely okay (X-Men Origins: Wolverine) while always remaining entertaining and watchable. I've never left an X-Men movie disappointed, though I admittedly enter with the expectation of being entertained and that's it. For a comparison, if I got an X-Men type experience when seeing The Dark Knight Rises, I'd be disappointed because I expect more than just entertainment from that franchise. X-Men: First Class continues this trend of singles and doubles without swinging for the fences.
The differences between First Class and the other X-Men movies is clear by just looking at the cast list. Past X-Men movies have featured such stars as Patrick Stewart, Hugh Jackman, Ian McKellen, Halle Berry, Liev Schreiber and even early roles by young future stars Anna Paquin and Ellen Page while the biggest star in First Class is arguably Kevin Bacon. This actually works to the movies advantage, instead of reacting to a new character by saying "oh hey it's Halle Berry!" you think "sweet, it's Havok!", making the movie a more engrossing experience and less of a E! red carpet special. But the cast of First Class is B-list in fame only, James McAvoy and Michael Fassbender both give excellent performances as main characters Charles Xavier and Erik Lehnsherr (aka Magneto) respectively, while Jennifer Lawrence (Raven), Rose Byrne (Moira MacTaggert), and Nicholas Hoult (Hank McCoy) all shine in supporting roles. Kevin Bacon, as usual, is great as main villain Sebastian Shaw, though he isn't given a death worthy of the performance (more on that later). The one flaw in the cast is January Jones, she's a pretty face to be sure, but to call her flatter than a piece of paper is an insult to the acting skills of paper. She just shows no life at all, even when she's being choked by metal bars and quizzed for information she can't muster up much more than a pout. It doesn't help that she's given some of the worst dialogue in the movie ("Oh, and I wouldn’t call it a war, since that suggests both sides have an equal chance of winning.") or that her character is little more than eye candy in many scenes.
Story-wise, First Class suffers from the same problem almost all origin films do: too much to tell and not enough time to do it. The main plot revolves around the discovery of mutants by the C.I.A. and Xavier's attempt to bring together mutants to fight Shaw's "Hellfire Club", which wants to destroy all non-mutants. Other storylines include Lehnsherr's quest for revenge and the struggles Raven and McCoy face with mutations that make them stand out from normal humans. All of this is entertaining, but it takes up too much time and distracts from the heart of the story. What is the heart of the story? It's the same thing that makes all X-Men stories great, the friendship and rivalry between Xavier and Lehnsherr and their neverending debate about how mutants and humans should co-exist (or in the case of Lehnsherr, not) but we don't get much of the friendship aspect because things are rushed so much in the early stages. In a matter of minutes, their relationship goes from first meeting to fast friends with only one scene with them in between. This would have been a much better movie if more time had been spent on their relationship and less on the Lehnsherr/Raven/McCoy love triangle, which not only isn't really resolved but doesn't really carry any emotional weight. That's the other problem, because there are so many characters and storylines, the truly emotional scenes like Lehnsherr facing off with Shaw, who killed his mother are rushed and he dies with hardly a fight despite spending the previous 15 minutes to his death building up vast amounts of nuclear energy to power his mutation. There are other missteps along the way, such as despite the movie being set in 1962, little to nothing of the world at that time is shown. If not for some Russians, short dresses, and an occasional "groovy", the movie could be easily set in modern time. But the core problem with First Class is the core problem with all X-Men stories, we don't have a strong emotional response to the prejudice against mutants because we're not mutants and there's no such thing as mutants so it doesn't, deep down, ring true. Sure, you feel a little pang when the young mutants are called "freaks" but it doesn't grip you the same way say, To Kill A Mockingbird does.
With all that said, however, First Class is an enjoyable summer movie that you can go see with little chance of feeling like you wasted your money while being thoroughly entertained throughout. If you're expecting a movie that will challenge you mentally and emotionally, you'll be disappointed, but if you go hoping to be entertained by (mostly) great acting with colorful characters, action, and the nostalgia only superheros can bring, you'll be happy.
3/5
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Song of the Day: September 15th
Shearwater's Jonathan Meiburg has an amazing voice. There's no debating that; it's a piercing, pure voice that can't be compared to any other vocalist because it's so unique, only words like sharp, searing, soaring can describe it. But one of the reasons that it is so spectacular is that the band know so perfectly how to use it; in the beginning of his voice starts as a gentle purr over a light piano chords, but suddenly it explodes over the top, then just as rapidly, it returns back to gentle slowly building towards a massive closing crescendo. The piano mirrors the vocals, growing louder and more decisive in its chords; which is really the thing with Meiburg's vocals, they're another instrument.
Listen
Live video
Monday, September 14, 2009
Song of the Day: September 14th
For a bunch of people in their twenties or older, Broken Social Scene nail the feelings of teenager pretty well here, but it's the style at which they are delivered that really drives things home; Emily Haines' wavering, effects laden vocals display the indecision of youth and the gentle repetition of "park that car, drop that phone, sleep on the floor, dream about me" begins slowly, but then reaches an unbelievable height of intensity. The song is basically a banjo an strings with a little percussion, which create a light background that Haines' voice fills like a instrument in itself. The song maybe folkish, but the melody is pure pop. Which suits a band like Broken Social Scene, which has never done what it was supposed to.
Listen
Live version!
Saturday, September 12, 2009
Playing for Change
The version of "Stand by Me" is also highly recommended.
Song of the Day: September 12th
from If You're Feeling Sinister
For a songwriter with some of the best one liners in music, Stuart Murdoch really out does himself on this song. From the very first line through the whole song, Murdoch is very self-aware, something more songwriters need to be: "nobody writes them like they used to, so it may as well be me", "think of it this way, you could either be successful or be us" and that's just in the first couple lines. He shifts gears from self-referential to fantastical, telling a fairy tale: "Said the hero in the story, 'it is mightier than swords, I could kill sure but I could only make you cry with these words'". Each line is painstakingly crafted to lead into the next continuing the winding story; usually in songwriting you get great one liners or a great story, Murdoch does the rare and has both.
Listen
Great live version